iphone手机最优HIFI解决方案——德国Ultrasone极致便携解码耳放NAOS

wicopy

terry33541 发表于 2018-5-22 17:13
发现从来没有人把naos和红蜻蜓做对比 好奇怪。 有人能来说一下吗，哪个音质更好啊？？？

[url=]2017年10月30日上午2:17
[/url]帖子＃4之15



imperialblue

新头颅

加入时间： 2015年4月27日
帖子： 43
喜欢： 17

实际上我有机会在今年的RMAF上听到Ultrasone NAOS。这非常好。我使用Audirvana +通过我的Macbook pro与我的64 Audio Tia Fourtes配对。我刚刚听完了Opus＃2（我听过的最好的DAP），A＆K SP1000（非常详细，但感觉不是音乐上的吸引力）和Sony WM1Z（听起来和Opus＃2一样好）但没有Tidal / Wifi / External DAC模式被破坏 - 它是价格的3倍）。没想到太多，因为它“仅”24bit / 192Khz而我无法通过Audirvana以DSD为食。但是我错了。死了错。我听到的三首歌听起来都不可思议。实际上我第二天又回到原地再听一遍，试图直接比较早前给我留下深刻印象的Opus＃2（在发送DSD256的外部DAC模式下使用它）。Ultrasone NAOS仍然令我震惊 - 无法相信我从200美元的单位获得的声音。然后插入我的AudioQuest DragonFly Red进行直接比较，发现Ultrasone听起来更加细致，音乐更具吸引力（一种罕见的组合）。Macbook pro 与我的64 Audio Tia Fourtes 配对。我刚刚听完Opus＃2（我听说过的最好的DAP），A＆K SP1000（非常详细，但并不觉得它在音乐上有吸引力）和Sony WM1Z（听起来和Opus＃2一样好）但没有潮汐/ Wifi /外部DAC模式是交易破坏者 - 它的价格是它的3倍。因为它只有“24bit / 192Khz”，所以没有多少期望，我无法通过Audirvana进入DSD。但是我错了。死了错。我听到的所有三首歌都听起来令人难以置信。我实际上第二天回去再次听到它试图直接与Opus＃2进行比较，后者给我留下了深刻印象（在外部DAC中使用它）模式发送它DSD256）。Ultrasone NAOS仍然令我震惊 - 无法相信我从200美元的单位获得的声音。然后，我插入我的AudioQuest DragonFly Red进行直接比较，并发现Ultrasone听起来更加细致和更具音乐吸引力（一种罕见的组合）。

唯一的问题是通过Audirvana的音量控制+使用NAOS不能按设计工作。它不会顺利上升或下降。我不得不手动拖动音量指示器，即使这样它会超出/下冲我想去的地方。希望这只是一个预生产问题。

回到家，立即预订。

以上是谷歌翻译，原文：I actually had a chance to hear the Ultrasone NAOS at RMAF this year. It was incredibly good. I was using Audirvana+ through my Macbook pro paired with my 64 Audio Tia Fourtes. I had just gotten done listening to the Opus#2 ( best DAP I've heard), A&K SP1000 ( extremely detailed but just didn't feel it was musically engaging), and the Sony WM1Z (sounded as good as the Opus #2 but no Tidal/Wifi/External DAC mode were deal breakers - and it's 3X the price). Wasn't expecting much since it was "only" 24bit/192Khz and I couldn't feed in DSD via Audirvana. But I was wrong. Dead wrong. All three songs I heard from it sounded incredible. I actually went back the next day to hear it again to try to compare directly to the Opus#2 which had impressed me earlier ( using it in external DAC mode sending it DSD256). The Ultrasone NAOS still wowed me - couldn't believe the sound I was getting from a $200 unit. I then plugged in my AudioQuest DragonFly Red to do a direct comparison and just found the Ultrasone sounded more detailed AND more musically engaging ( a rare combination).Macbook pro paired with my 64 Audio Tia Fourtes. I had just gotten done listening to the Opus#2 ( best DAP I've heard), A&K SP1000 ( extremely detailed but just didn't feel it was musically engaging), and the Sony WM1Z (sounded as good as the Opus #2 but no Tidal/Wifi/External DAC mode were deal breakers - and it's 3X the price). Wasn't expecting much since it was "only" 24bit/192Khz and I couldn't feed in DSD via Audirvana. But I was wrong. Dead wrong. All three songs I heard from it sounded incredible. I actually went back the next day to hear it again to try to compare directly to the Opus#2 which had impressed me earlier ( using it in external DAC mode sending it DSD256). The Ultrasone NAOS still wowed me - couldn't believe the sound I was getting from a $200 unit. I then plugged in my AudioQuest DragonFly Red to do a direct comparison and just found the Ultrasone sounded more detailed AND more musically engaging ( a rare combination).

Only issue I had was the volume control via Audirvana+ using the NAOS was not working as designed. It wouldn't go up or down smoothly. I had to manually drag the volume indicator and even then it would over/undershoot where I was trying to go. Hoping that it was just a preproduction issue.

Got home and immediately placed a preorder.

wicopy

terry33541 发表于 2018-7-2 11:54
嗯 感谢翻译， 之前在google搜到过这个帖子。 已入红蜻蜓，有机会收个naos再对比。 不过估计也是半斤八两 ...

恩，我估计素质也差不多，今天naos到手，对比手机直推确实提升很大，声音整体变得凝聚扎实，推力变大，动态和控制力更好，两端延伸和细腻度都有明显的提升，耐听度提高，声场明显拉开，灵敏度比较高的大耳也能控制得比较好了，不像原来直推那么绵软，没那么空洞了。我也想收个红蜻蜓对比一下。

wicopy

这东西其实对安卓的适配性更好。