【译】Goldring DR150评测

fant · 发表于 2012-5-15 16:52

请尊重译者劳动成果，转载请注明

Goldring DR150
Goldring（金环）DR150

RETAIL: $150
零售价格：$150美元

Provided by: Music Hall
由Music Hall（音乐厅）提供

As many audiophiles might know, Goldring is a company with a storied history in vinyl and turntables. But did you know the company has also made headphones? While the company hasn't made very many though, it's interesting to note that it released not just one, but three headphones just last year - the DR50, DR100, and DR150. The DR150 sits in the highest position and is unique from the other two with its titanium film diaphragm whereas the other two use Mylar diaphragms. How does this translate to its sound quality? Read on to find out.
正如许多高级音响发烧友们可能了解的那样，金环公司（Goldring）是一家有着传奇发展历史的黑胶唱片及唱盘生产企业。但是你是否知道这家企业同时还生产耳机呢？虽然这家公司此前所生产的耳机数量并不多，但是很值得关注的一点是，仅仅在去年，金环（Goldring）就推出了三款头戴式耳机，它们分别是：DR50, DR100以及DR150。DR150是其中最为高端的一款耳机，其独特的钛质振动薄膜设计使这款耳机区别于另外两款采用聚酯振动薄膜的耳机。而这一特点又是如何转化成高音质的呢？让我们一起探索其中的奥妙吧。

Associated Components
相关部件

Source: Arcam FMJ CD33
来源：雅俊FMJ（金甲部队） CD33镭射唱盘

Power cord: Signal Cable Silver Resolution Reference
电源线：银质信号线解析度参考

Interconnects: Audioquest Python, Signal Cable Silver Resolution Analog
连接线：线圣绿蟒蛇，银质信号线解析度模拟

Headphone amplifiers: Eddie Current EC/SS, HeadAmp Gilmore Lite v2 w/ DPS, Lehmann Black Cube Linear
头戴式耳机扩大器：Eddie Current EC/SS，Gilmore Lite v2 w/ DPS耳机放大器，莱曼头戴式耳机放大器

Comparison Headphones: AKG K701, Audio-Technica ATH-AD2000 & ATH-ES7, Koss KSC75, Sennheiser HD650
头戴式耳机对比产品：爱科技（AKG） K701, 铁三角（Audio-Technica）ATH-AD2000及ATH-ES7, 高斯（Koss KSC75）, 森海塞尔（Sennheiser）HD650

Retail price of review component: $149.99
以上回顾的组件零售价为：$149.99美元

Listening CDs
试音CD
Alison Krauss - Lonely Runs Both Ways
艾莉森•克劳斯 - Lonely Runs Both Ways（《孤独地两处奔波》）

Eva Cassidy – Songbird
Eva Cassidy（伊娃•凯西蒂） –Songbird（《飞鸟之歌》）

Howard Shore - The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King OST
霍华德•萧 –The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King（《指环王：王者归来》原声大碟）

Jewel – Spirit
Jewel（珠儿）- Spirit（《心灵》）

KT Tunstall - Eye To The Telescope
KT Tunstall（凯蒂•彤斯朵） - Eye To The Telescope（《望远镜下的爱情》）

Massive Attack – Protection
Massive Attack（大举进攻乐队） – Protection（《保护》）

Neotropic - Mr. Brubaker's Strawberry Alarm Clock
Neotropic（新热带乐队） - Mr. Brubaker's Strawberry Alarm Clock（《布鲁贝克尔先生的草莓闹钟》）

Porcupine Tree - In Absentia
Porcupine Tree（刺猬上树乐团） - In Absentia（《缺席》）

Radiohead - OK Computer
Radiohead （收音机头乐队）- OK Computer（《OK，电脑》）

Renee Fleming - Thais (Massenet, 1894)
Renee Fleming（蕾妮•弗莱明）- Thais (Massenet, 1894)（《泰伊思（冥想曲，1894）》）

The Crystal Method - Tweekend
The Crystal Method （水晶疗法合唱团）– Tweekend（《周末乐逍遥》）

Physical Aspects
物理性质
Physically, the DR150 has a lot in common with the Sennheiser HD580/600/650 headphones - the framework is encased in tough, dark-grey plastic, in a very simplistic, head-conforming shape. The underside of the headband and earpads are also similarly lined with plush yet firm velour, and the drivers are covered with a thin piece of foam. A similar compact form-factor as well, as it's not overly large that would make it cumbersome to deal with. Construction is nice and solid too, as it feels like it can take some abuse and keep on ticking. Fit adjustment is achieved by sliding the earcups up and down along the frame, with internal notches so you can feel how many "ticks" are along the slide. Unlike the aforementioned Sennheiser headphones though, the earcups on the DR150 can swivel for better adjustment on large heads.
从物理性质而言，DR150头戴式耳机与森海塞尔（Sennheiser）的HD580/600/650头戴式耳机有着许多共同之处——整个耳机外壳包裹在坚固的深灰色塑料材质中，外观十分简约，并且其造型能够带来舒适的佩戴体验。头柄的底面及耳垫同样也衬有舒适且坚固的天鹅绒，同时传动器上都覆盖有一层薄薄的泡沫膜。此外，紧凑式的结构也是它们的共同之处，耳机的体积不会过大以免在使用时造成不便。结构美观且十分结实，因为这款耳机使人觉得即使偶尔粗暴对待它或是反复调节，它也依然能够正常工作。将耳罩沿着耳机框上下滑动就能够进行适当的调整，耳机框上的内部触点能够让您清楚感觉到耳机一边已经调整了几个“点”了。与上文所提及的森海塞尔（Sennheiser）头戴式耳机不同的是，DR150耳机的耳罩可以进行旋转，从而更好地适应较大的脑袋。

Initially, the headphones were a bit uncomfortable due to the firmness of the velour on the earpads and headband, but both loosened up after a few days. And once the velour loosens up, the headphones become very comfortable, and easy to wear for very long periods of time without any soreness. Wear it and forget it, essentially.
最初，头戴式耳机会令人稍微感觉不舒适，这是由于耳垫以及头柄中的天鹅绒的坚固程度所造成的，但是几天之后它们就会变得松软。而且一旦天鹅绒变得松软，耳机就会变得十分舒适而且使用者可以很轻易地佩戴很长时间而完全不会有任何酸痛感。从本质上讲，佩戴着耳机却没有任何感觉。

Also of note here is that the DR150 uses a standard mini-mini interconnect as the cable, so theoretically it may very well be possible to improve the sound of the headphone with aftermarket interconnects. It's cabled for single-entry on the left earcup, but the right earcup also looks like it has an input mini-jack on it, so it may be possible to "mod" the headphones with a dual-entry left & right cable.
还值得注意的一点是DR150耳机所使用的连线是一个标准的超微型连接线，因此从理论上讲它在很大程度上能够极好地利用次级市场的连接器产品来提高头戴式耳机的音质。左侧耳机的线路为单进线型而右侧耳机看起来也像是配备有一个微型输入音频接口，因此使用一个双进线的左右连线就可以实现对耳机的“改装”。

Burn-in
煲机
The DR150 was burned in for almost 200 hours for this review, based on Internet reports that it takes about that long to settle in. Initially there was some sibilance that made it very bothersome to listen to any vocalists (male and female alike), and there was also too much overdraw on cymbal strikes and other metallic sounds. Thankfully, after that burn-in time, the sibilance virtually disappeared. Some grain in the trebled that also existed also gradually lessened to the point where it wasn't immediately noticeable. There was also a small increase in bass quantity, and an increase in overall clarity as well.
在本次评测前，DR150耳机已经煲了近200小时，根据网络报告DR150经过了如此长时间的煲机之后达到了最佳状态。最初，这款耳机有一些丝丝声，在用耳机听声乐家们演唱的时候会令人感到十分讨厌（男女声乐家都是如此），此外对铙钹敲击和其他金属声的渲染也过多。幸运的是，在经过了煲机之后，这种丝丝声已经彻底消失。并且此前还存在的最高声部上的颗粒感也逐渐降低到不至于被立即察觉的程度。低音部的质量也略微有所提高，并且整体的清晰度也得到了提升。

Soundstage
声场
The DR150 doesn't throw much of a soundstage - it's more flat and fronted, not 3D, and it's also on the small side. It's somewhat comparable to the soundstage of Grado headphones, which have a small stage and lean towards an in-your-face kind of sound, to make it feel like you're up on the stage with the musicians instead of sitting in any of the rows. The DR150 also has this in-your-face quality, only not quite as much as Grados - while there's still not that much "air" presented, it does take a virtual step back that makes it sound less brash and fatiguing. The DR150 also isn't very high-end so it can't compete with headphones like the AKG K701 which paints a very 3D picture of the sound - in comparison, it has almost no 3D air and it doesn't exactly delineate left/right positioning all that well. It separates the channels cleanly though, it's just not revealing of how far left or how far right an instrument is. Not that there's anything wrong with this because the K701 is a unique headphone and a high-end piece at that, and most lower-end headphones don't have defined soundstages anyway, only stating this to point out where the DR150 stacks relative to higher-end headphones.
DR150耳机并不会产生过大的声场——它更加扁平和靠前，不具备3D的音质，而且它的声场相对较小。在某种程度上，这款耳机的声场与Grado耳机颇为相似，后者的声场较小而且更加倾向于逼真的声音效果，它会使你感觉自己仿佛正和音乐家们一起站在舞台上，而不是坐在观众席的任何一排。DR150耳机也具备这样逼真的声音效果，不仅可以与Grados耳机媲美，同时此款耳机所产生的“气场”仍然不会过于强大，事实上这款耳机向后退了一步，这使得它的声音效果没有那么急促，也不会令人觉得疲劳。DR150耳机也不属于十分高端的类型，因此它无法与像爱科技（AKG） K701耳机那样能够创造出一种十分具有3D效果音质的耳机相比——相较而言，DR150耳机几乎不存在3D气场，而且它也确实无法如此完美地创造出左右定位的效果。虽然此款耳机将各个声道区分得干净利落，但是它依然无法展示出乐器在左右两边的程度差异。这并不表示这样的产品特点存在任何问题，因为K701是一款独特的头戴式耳机而且还属于头戴式耳机中的高端机型，除此之外，大部分低端的耳机产品都不具备明确的声场效果，指出上述产品特点的目的仅在于说明DR150耳机相比于高端耳机存在的差异。

Detail/Resolution
细节/解析度
Detail retrieval on the DR150 is actually surprisingly good for a headphone in its price range, definitely a step up from other headphones like the AKG K240 or K271 Studio, or the Grado SR225. It does have an overall treble emphasis that helps with this, and it's easily able to pick out quick, high-frequency clinks and cues and so forth. However, because of its compacted soundstage and a tendency to swirl complicated mixes into a "soup" (rather than providing clean & clear layer separation), it often feels like the actual delivery of said detail is lost in the mix. Tape hiss isn't very apparent on it for example, as it's intrinsically a background element that headphones with "separated" sounds recover best. On the flip side though, the DR150 presents a very integrated response that certainly doesn't sound very un-separated - it's really only in comparison to headphones like the K701 where it's readily apparent. Of course the K701 is a much higher-end headphone, again stating this as a point of reference only. The DR150 also easily manages densely-layered mixes, as nothing ever sounds congested or suffocated or muddied - consistently surprisingly clear sound on the most densely-packed tracks, even if some of the details are lost in the process.
DR150细节检索效果在它所处的价位上确实令人出乎意料地出色，绝对比其他如（爱科技）AKG K240或K271 Studio耳机，或Grado SR225等的其他耳机胜出一筹。这款耳机的整体高音巧华效果确实为此增色不少，而且它能够轻易地辨别出快速的高频叮当声及声音细节等等。但是，由于其紧凑型的声场以及倾向于将复杂的混音转换为一种“混合效果”的特点（而不是产生干净明晰的层次划分），所以这款耳机经常使人感觉上述细节实际上输出时会消失在音质的混合中。举例而言，带着这款耳机播放音乐时磁带的嘶嘶声不是非常明显，因为从本质上讲存在一个背景要素，即具有“分离”音质效果的头戴式耳机的复原效果最佳。但是从另一方面而言，DR150耳机会呈现出一种十分协调合成的反馈效果，而这样的效果听起来自然不会十分无法分离——这一点只是在与如K701这样的耳机进行对比时才会十分明显。当然，K701是一款比DR150高端许多的耳机，指出这一点同样仅出于提供参考的目的。DR150还能够轻易地管理层次密集的混音，因为从未出现过声音拥挤、令人窒息或是模糊混乱的效果——这款耳机在排列最为密集的声道上能够一贯地保持令人惊喜的清晰音质，即便在这过程中会遗失掉某些细节。

Amplification
放大
The DR150 easily responds to changes in the amplification stage, about as much as the aforementioned AKG K240 and Grado SR225. Like the SR225 it's also low-impedance at 32 Ohms, and as the rating implies, it did indeed prove to be quite efficient. I briefly tried it on a HeadRoom Bithead USB DAC/amp connected to a laptop (using ripped WAV copies of various tracks from the above-listed CDs) and then compared to my CD-based home system, switching between the Lehmann Black Cube Linear, HeadAmp Gilmore Lite v2, and an Eddie Current EC/SS. Of course it sounded much better on my CD-based system, but the extent at which it sounded better was surprising - it opened up more than I thought it would. It wasn't very synergistic with the Gilmore Lite as that amp cranked up the treble to a fatiguing level, but the other two amps helped fill out its mid-range and added more dynamic swing to the sound. Not that the DR150 really needs amps on the scale of these three, as they're really for higher-end headphones than it, but it scaled up well and just went to show that its potential with higher-end amps (or sources as the case might be).
DR150能够轻易地应对在放大阶段的各种变化，大约与上文所述的爱科技（AKG） K240和Grado SR225耳机得到相同的放大效果。和SR225耳机一样，这款耳机同样在32欧姆时保持低阻抗，并且根据额定功率显示，这款耳机确实被证明是一款十分高效的机型。我在HeadRoom Bithead USB DAC/耳机放大器上短暂试用了这款耳机，将耳放连接到笔记本电脑上（选用上文中所列出的CD中各首曲目的WAV转化格式音乐），而后将其与我的CD家用音响设备进行对比，在莱曼头戴式耳机放大器、Gilmore Lite v2 w/ DPS耳机放大器以及Eddie Current EC/SS之间切换使用。当然，用我的CD家用音响设备播放效果要好出许多，但是其音质的突出效果令人惊讶——它所呈现出的效果远比我想象的优秀。这款耳机与Gilmore Lite耳机放大器不是十分协调，因为此款耳放将高音部的音量放大到了一种令人感到疲劳的程度，但是另外两款耳放有助于将DR150的中音效果提升并且为声音增添了许多富有活力的音律。这并不是说DR150耳机必须要使用这三款耳机放大器类型的耳放，因为它们实际上针对的是比DR150高端的头戴式耳机，但是它们实现了对DR150极佳的放大效果并且显示出此款耳机在高端放大器（或者根据具体情况而定的其他输入源）的配合下所激发出的巨大潜能。

Attack & Decay
冲击与衰减
Attack is fine on the DR150, nothing really worthy to mention about it, but decay, on the other hand, is way too fast on it. Notes tend to sound like they're continually being abruptly cut off and not allowed to end. It's actually pretty noticeable and one of the first things I noticed - at first I thought it was something with the treble response or soundstage but further listening revealed that it just has too short of a decay. It's most noticeable on percussion instruments, as there should be that moment of sound exiting into the air for some "shimmer," but it's just completely cut off, as if there's no air and the music is playing in a vacuum or some kind of bubble. There's no cymbal wah for example, it's just the cymbal strike, the metallic zzzhh, but when the time comes for the wah to kick in, it kinda starts, but then kinda stops, and you don't hear the "ahhh" part. Needless to say, this does affect runs of fast notes, as they end up sounding unnatural.
DR150耳机上的冲击效果不错，不过在这一点上没有什么特别值得一提的地方。但在另一方面，这款耳机的衰减效果相对而言过于迅速。音符听起来令人感觉似乎它们不断地被突兀地切断并且还无法结束。事实上，这一点十分明显而且也是我最先发现的特点之一——最初我认为这与高音部的反馈或声场有一定关系，但是进一步使用这款耳机听音乐之后我发现造成这一现象的原因是其衰减过程过短。在打击乐器中这一现象最为明显，因为本应该有一段时间使声音能够退入空气中产生某种“闪光”的效果，但是这款耳机完全将这一效果阻断，就好像四周没有空气，而音乐是在真空或者某种气泡中播放。举例而言，其中不存在铙钹哇音效果器，仅仅只有铙钹打击的声音以及金属的滋滋声，但是等到哇音开始生效的时候，它在某种程度上启动了一点点效果，但是而后又感觉像是停止了，而且你并没有听到“啊啊”的部分。不用说，这样的特点无疑对快音符的播放效果产生了影响，因为它们最后都会发出不自然的声音。

Sound - Treble
声音 – 高音
As mentioned above, the DR150's treble starts out sibilant and a bit "hot," but after some burn-in (about 200 hours or so), much of it goes away and is replaced by an overall emphasis. It's definitely not flat in the treble, as there are spikes that contribute to it sounding fatiguing on components that accentuate (or at least don't hide) the treble, like silver interconnects and bright-sounding amps. Never harsh on its own, but it can be made that way from other parts in the signal chain. Aside from this, it's still a good treble response, as it's nicely, audibly extended all the way up to at least 18 kHz, and it probably goes beyond a bit too (my hearing tops out at 18-19 kHz). It's strong enough to give high-order harmonics a sense of power, although not quite at ear-decimating level, and it's controlled well too, as it provides a good sense of precision without sounding like a knife, though it could still probably be dialed down a little.
正如我在上文中所提及的，DR150耳机的高音会发出咝咝声而且还有点“热”，但是在经过一段时间的预烧之后（大约200小时左右），大部分的咝咝声就会消失，并且这种咝咝声会被一种整体强调的效果所取代。这款耳机的高音绝对不会扁平，因为其中含脉冲的效果，有助于使这款耳机在突出高音（或者至少不隐藏高音）的组成部分中产生令人疲惫的声音效果，就像银质连接线与产生洪亮声音效果的放大器一样。这款耳机自身不会产生富有冲击力的效果，但是在信号链中的其他部分可以产生这样的冲击效果。除此之外，当这款耳机的声音效果被完美地提升到至少18千赫时，它还会产生很好的高音反应效果，而且还很有可能会稍微超出一些（我听到的极限在18-19千赫）。这款耳机足够强大可以使高位和声产生一种强有力的感觉，虽然在听觉麻木的状况下不会太过明显，但是这种效果也能得到很好的控制，因为它能够产生给人以很好的精绝度的感觉，同时又不会发出像小刀一样的声音，虽然它还是有可能会稍微下拨一些。

Sound - Mid-range
声音 – 中音
It might seem like an oxymoron, but the DR150's mid-range is both forward and flat - forward in the upper part, flat in the lower part. The forwardness affects vocals, guitars - the standard run of instruments too - and provides for a direct, in-your-face, Grado-like sound. It's not as forward as the Grado SR225 for example, but it's not laidback, it's more of a direct and assertive sound rather than brash. And I say the lower mid-range is flat because of how the headphones sound with different amps - with the Gilmore Lite, that range is a bit recessed (not unexpected at all), but with the Black Cube Linear and EC/SS, it fills back in for some body and fullness. Not a whole lot of body though, but a definite & significant increase when switching between amps, so from logical deduction the headphone has a close-to-flat lower mid-range, which works quite well actually. It's unusual to have this kind of amp dependency in this price range, so it's important to pair it with a synergistic one.
虽然可能听起来有些矛盾，但是DR150的中音效果属于在上部时既靠前又扁平，在下部时扁平的风格。靠前的效果会影响歌声与吉他声——以及乐器标准的声音——而且还会产生一种直接的、气势逼人的声音效果，就像Grado耳机一样。举例而言，这款耳机的效果并没有Grado SR225那么靠前，但是也不会滞后，它的声音效果更加直接且稳定，不会有急促的感觉。而且，我说相对较低的中音比较扁平，其原因在乎此款耳机搭配上不同的耳机放大器之后所产生的声音效果——搭配Gilmore Lite耳放，这款耳机的音域就会产生轻微的嵌入感（这一点完全出乎意料），但是在搭配Black Cube Linear耳放及EC/SS耳放时，有些使用者就会感觉有回填的音效而且音质丰满成熟。虽然不是绝大部分情况下都是如此，但是在不同的耳放之间进行切换时确实存在着显著的提高，因此根据逻辑推理，此款耳机具有接近于扁平的低重音效果，而这种效果实际上表现十分良好。在这种价位上能够入手这种类型的耳放附属产品实属罕见，因此要将此款耳机和能够与其匹配的耳放相搭配是十分重要的。

Relative to the Grado SR225, the mid-range overall is pretty similar, as if it has the same basic shape on a frequency graph, but the DR150 has the more evened-out response. And relative to the Koss KSC75, there's much more lower mid-range clarity - the Koss completely muddies the lower mid-range up, mostly due to an overbearing mid-bass that infects and clouds up the lower mids. The DR150, on the other hand, isn't muddy at all and retains full clarity with a mid-bass that's well under control.
相比于Grado SR225耳机，它们整体的中音效果十分相似，就好像这款耳机在频率图上的基本形状都和SR225完全一致，但是DR150具有更加平整的反馈效果。而与高斯（Koss ）的KSC75耳机相比，此款耳机的低重音清晰度要高出许多，高斯耳机完全将低重音混合在一起，这一现象最主要的原因是中低音的强势效果影响了低中音并增加了它的模糊程度。另一方面DR150耳机完全没有混沌的感觉而且充分保留了中低音的清晰度，而且能够很好地控制中低音。

Sound - Bass
声音 – 低音
The DR150's bass extends low enough for general purposes, but it's not quite low enough to provide a very satisfying experience with electronica, as it starts tapping out at approximately 40 Hz and rapidly recesses below that point. It's not that it can't thump, it just doesn't sink to gut-level bass - the low rolls and phases prevalent on Crystal Method's "Tweekend" CD are almost entirely missed on it, as it just barely gets the tops of these notes. This lack of extension doesn't really matter though when you stop and listen, and find out that the bass response is disarmingly punchy. Not boomy or out of control, just punchy. Very good impact, it definitely knows how to slam and thump with an almost infectious energy, and it has a great insistence too, well able to spring from one bass note to the next without sounding slow or plodgy. If it had a personality it'd be akin to a boxer, as it simply has a great swift punch, for lack of a better word. In this aspect it's kind of a win-lose situation - you have to sacrifice some extension, but at least there's some really good impact that drives up the energetic factor.
对于一般用途而言，DR150耳机的低音效果足够低，但是对于创造出令人满意电子音乐听觉效果而言，此款耳机的低音效果还不足够，因为在大约40赫兹时它就会发出敲击声并且在40赫兹以下迅速地消失。这并不表示这款耳机无法发出重击声，它只是无法下降到最低的低音效果——在播放The Crystal Method （水晶疗法合唱团）的CD“ Tweekend”（《周末乐逍遥》）时，歌曲中普遍存在的低音转音及音阶效果几乎全部无法呈现，因为此款耳机只是单纯的呈现出这些音符的最高音效果。虽然如此，但是当你停止播放及开始听音乐时，缺少扩展的效果并不是问题，而且你会发现它的低音反馈效果十分强劲有力，让你完全没有任何顾虑。放音时不存在任何嗡嗡声或是失控的现象，彻底的强劲有力。这款耳机能够带来极佳的效果，它完全知道如何发出猛击及重击的声音，同时产生几乎具有感染性的能量，除此之外它还具有连贯性，能够很好地从一个低音音符跳转到下一个音符同时不会出现缓慢或滞后的声音效果。如果将它比作人类，那么它的性格更像是一名拳击手，因为它仅仅拥有强劲快速的出拳却缺少很好的表达能力。从这以方面而言，这在某种程度上属于一种顾此失彼的状况——你必须牺牲一些扩展性，但是至少保留着一些非常好的效果，能够提升自身的活力因素。

The Goldring DR150 has its flaws, but at $150, there's really not that much to complain about. In fact, $150 is a downright steal for these and nets you a good solid headphone that can be used for almost any kind of music or any kind of application. It's an excellent starter headphone and can easily be considered a gateway into the world of headphones. True audiophiles might want to pass on it, but it's an easy recommendation for everyone else, especially those on a budget, looking for an alternative to Grados, AKGs, Sennheisers, or Audio-Technicas.
金环（Goldring）DR150的确存在一些缺点，但是$150美元的价格确实没有太多值得抱怨的地方。事实上，$150美元就能够获得这些功能，根本就是彻头彻尾的偷窃了，而且只要$150美元就可以让你拥有一副坚固的好耳机，它可以用来听几乎所有类型的音乐或者还可以用作各种应用。DR150是一款优秀的入门级耳机，完全可以将其视为是通往耳机世界的一扇大门。真正的高级音响发烧友们可能会希望入手此款耳机，但是对于每个普通使用者而言，它也绝对值得推荐，对于那些预算有限又希望买到类似于Grado、爱科技（AKG）、森海塞尔（Sennheiser）或铁三角（Audio-Technica）等品牌的耳机产品的使用者而言更是如此。

帐号		自动登录	找回密码
密码			-注册-